On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 22:48 +0000, Dougie Nisbet wrote: > > I've stopped using f-spot for time adjustments. I find it easier to use > exiv2. This is usually because I'm adjusting a load of images to > correlate with their 'real time' as photographed on my GPS, and often > I'll be typing, (as I was an hour ago), something like: > > exiv2 -a -00:00:03 *
But that does not sync the time that is stored in the f-spot database, which I would guess is the actual time used to sort the pictures. > Note that you can run exiv2 against images that are within the f-spot > database and it doesn't seem to matter. I also do this with exifer (MS > Windows program) against images in my f-spot collection without any > problems. But do they fall into the time-sort properly? b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ F-spot-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
