On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]> wrote: > On 15 May 2010 15:14, Robert Latest <[email protected]> wrote: >> BTW, the rest of f-spot looks pretty good from what I've been able to >> test. But it is very, very sluggish. This is a 512MB 2GHz AMD machine. > > I would suggest getting more RAM, I would not recommend editing and > managing photos without at least 2 Gb RAM nowadays.
Only if the software involved is programmed inefficiently (as f-spot may very well be). I don't see the point in slowing down the importing of images by displayign them all as thumbnails. If f-spot really tries to keep thousands of thumbnails in memory while updating imported images -- well I don't know. robert _______________________________________________ f-spot-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
