Wasn't there some work going towards having a PPA for f-spot? That seems like a much easier way to go, if we want testers.
Michael Lissner [email protected] 909-576-4123 Ruben Vermeersch wrote on 06/18/2010 07:15 AM: > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 15:02 +0100, Dougie Nisbet wrote: > >> On 18/06/2010 13:47, ceed wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:44:58 -0500, zekopeko <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Try compiling it and post the output here (not the WHOLE output but >>>> the part where it gives you errors). >>>> >>> It's actually not the compiling that gives me error's, it is >>> .configure. Should I still try "make" and post the output? >>> >> I got lots of missing deps when I used .configure in ubuntu. It's >> usually just a case of working out which one it wants from the messages, >> installing it, and running .configure again. Repeat as necessary! I >> think I took about 5 attempts before it finally configured but it was >> just a case of going round the loop a few times. >> > > The build-dep trick only gives you the dependencies of the latest > packaged version, which is probably 0.6.1.5. Quite a bit of stuff has > changed since then, which you will need to install manually. Like Dougie > said: try and repeat. > > We should get packages soon, but I can't make accurate promises. > > _______________________________________________ > f-spot-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list > _______________________________________________ f-spot-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
