Hi Richard, Richard Hill schrieb: > I did install UFRaw over the weekend, with the aim of using it as a gimp > plugin. I didn't realise it was compatible with F-Spot, so I will try this. There is an F-Spot extension called "DevelopInUFraw", which adds a context menu to RAW-Pictures to do Right-click -> Develop in UFRaw. You can also do Batch-Processing when you select multiple pictures (images are processed with the same settings as the last one developed).
> standalone. However, UFRaw rendered images quite different to F-Spot. > The images looked absolutely great in F-Spot, but much darker in UFRaw - > shadowed regions for example were almost black. Try the curves from http://fotogenetic.dearingfilm.com/fotogenetic_correction_curves_v4.zip as "Base curve". And in "Corrections", up the contrast and saturation a bit. This should give better results. Also you can try to play with these two curves. I usually use one of the two base curves and then play around with the "Correction" curve. > Would anyone have any suggestions as to why this is, and which is > "right" (hopefully F-spot)? I'm not doing any processing or altering > of the image - just the default settings. The image displayed in F-Spot is the one that is stored inside the raw-File (see exiftool manual for how to extract them: "-JpgFromRaw") and this is the camera-processed image. Hope this helps, Fabian _______________________________________________ f-spot-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
