tor 2011-03-24 klockan 09:16 -0400 skrev Matthew Rasnake: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:00 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > One thing is clear: there are a lot of possibilities. > > ... > > > Anyway, those things are not something that there will be time for > > anyways, but it might influence the design decisions. > > > > Simon, et. al., > > Not to throw water on your enthusiasm,
Not at all :) > but doesn't Conduit (for example) > already provide some of the functionality you're looking for? Perhaps your > GSOC project could involve helping to beef up the F-Spot support in Conduit, > rather than rolling your own solution from the ground up? I completely forgot about Conduit, thanks for bringing it up. It is true that it does implement some of the things that will be needed. I wonder how much work it would be to extend it to support the rest of the requirements. Allowing plugins to add data to be synchronized could be especially tricky. I'm going to look into though, maybe Conduit's datamodel is flexible enough. > Whichever direction you end up going, best of luck with the project! Thanks! -- Simon Lindgren _______________________________________________ f-spot-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
