Don't have the original wording on the "why" for longer pucks but didn't it have something to do suspension repeatability or better set up.
Seems to me if we're expecting more travel (softer ride) without a rebound mechanism more wheel bouncie, bouncie follows...and that isn't a good thing. I guess I don't understand "how" the longer rubbers will impact/change suspension movement...like make the car handle better. Jay can you throw out some engineering on this subject? Also (for Jay) not all cars use the same kind of rubber material. Will Jay's testing results be applicable to us natural rubber racers? As far as increasing class size by telling people we have longer rubbers. Ahhh, I'm not so sure that's really a good selling point. Lou Schultz Philly Region ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Phaneuf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:35 AM Subject: [F500] Bigger Rubbers- misc thoughts & questions... > Chuck > That's were I've been coming from...is there a type of rubber that > will dampen the rebound enough to actually want more travel? > Stu Phipps had a comment during an event at Peru ( kinda bumpy ) > about pogo sticks having plenty of travel.......... > Dave Phaneuf > > _______________________________________________ > F500 mailing list - [email protected] > To unsubscribe or change options please visit: > http://f500.org/mailman/listinfo/f500 > *** Please, DO NOT send unsubscribe requests to the mailing list! *** _______________________________________________ F500 mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change options please visit: http://f500.org/mailman/listinfo/f500 *** Please, DO NOT send unsubscribe requests to the mailing list! ***
