The people writing the rules have not forgotten their physics, which is why the 
draft rules require stock bore, stroke, CR and ECU. The final draft may require 
stock internals as well, though this is still under discussion. Will there 
still be differences in engine performance? Sure, but that situation exists 
today in DSR with their $12,000 engines and doesn't seem to be a show stopper. 
Besides, the only way to achieve perfect engine parity is to require a 
single-source sealed engine, which isn't going to happen for a variety of 
reasons. In the end, perfection isn't required. This is a builders class, and 
people preparing a car for it will have to make informed decisions.

Stan

Chuck Voboril <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jay is right on.  A lot of money is 
necessary to get that extra 10HP out of 
those highly stressed and advanced motors.  Or, at the same peak HP, to get 
more reliable service or broader HP and more torque out of them.

With restrictors, a built bike motor that makes more HP over a broader HP 
range WILL indeed still accelerate  faster even if peak HP is the same as 
other motors.  I see very high compession build-ups of those street engines 
being the primary trick in an intake restictor class.

People who advocate restrictors generally also forget their physics and that 
torque is what determines ultimate top speed, not HP.

Running at the edge with  MC power, one probably just trades broken rings,  
bent valves, broken rods, and broken tranny gears for the cooked rings and 
piston tops in a 2-stroke. :->

To each their own!

Chuck


                
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
Spam detection software, running on the system "tucson.proadmin.com", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview:  The people writing the rules have not forgotten their
  physics, which is why the draft rules require stock bore, stroke, CR and
  ECU. The final draft may require stock internals as well, though this is
  still under discussion. Will there still be differences in engine
  performance? Sure, but that situation exists today in DSR with their
  $12,000 engines and doesn't seem to be a show stopper. Besides, the only
  way to achieve perfect engine parity is to require a single-source
  sealed engine, which isn't going to happen for a variety of reasons. In
  the end, perfection isn't required. This is a builders class, and people
  preparing a car for it will have to make informed decisions. [...] 

Content analysis details:   (3.1 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 1.0 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS          Subject is all capitals
-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
                            [score: 0.0000]
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 1.4 HTML_10_20             BODY: Message is 10% to 20% HTML
 0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE     RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
 1.4 DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS     RBL: Envelope sender in whois.rfc-ignorant.org
 1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST      RBL: Envelope sender in
                            postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org


________________________________
FormulaCar Magazine - A Proud Supporter of Formula 500
The Official Publication of Junior Formula Car Racing
Subscribe Today! www.formulacarmag.com or 519-624-2003
_________________________________



_______________________________________________
F500 mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe or change options please visit:
http://f500.org/mailman/listinfo/f500
*** Please, DO NOT send unsubscribe requests to the mailing list! ***

Reply via email to