On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Niklas Lindström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Are/will you be working on these changes? > > I haven't yet, and unfortunately have little to no time today. Did you > intend to remove `require` as an operation and could fold `invoke` in > at the same time, or would you like me to do that later?
It'd be great if you would do it. I just pushed changes that remove the set(), get() and getAny() operations and folds their functionality into Configuration, but my current focues is on updating the documentation with all the changes. > > To solve the more general problem with how commands are called, I > think we should go with the idea of wrapping command functions in > Command objects. That way we can control their execution fully. > > That is *if* commands are supposed to work properly when called from > other commands? As I discovered earlier, connections are duplicated > and removed incorrectly right now if you nest command calls in each > other, so that'd require more work on how `_connect` works. (Note that > this is not due to `invoke` and call chaining.) I think it should be possible for commands to call other commands. And `_connect` should be made intelligent enough to handle that. > > Best regards, > Niklas > -- Venlig hilsen / Kind regards, Christian Vest Hansen.
_______________________________________________ Fab-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user
