I think having a password-safe version of prompt() (either a separate command or an argument to prompt() itself) would be a good idea and I can't think of any obvious reason why it wouldn't work. The internal password related prompts use getpass (at least, they did when I last looked) and they work fine.
I'll star this convo in my GMail and will make sure this gets added to the TODO list sometime =) -Jeff On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Niklas Lindström <[email protected]> wrote: > Hm. Of course, I can just *use* getpass here, although I loose some of > the `prompt` features. Remaining then is whether some secret expansion > is still desirable (the solution of which may or may not make the > usecase of `secret_prompt` interesting again).. _______________________________________________ Fab-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user
