I have been contemplating a new release. The growing difference between 0.0.9 and HEAD is confusing people. Especially now that the website is documenting HEAD.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:51 AM, Jeff Forcier <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Allan, > > I can't speak authoritatively on this, but (I've alluded to this a few > times already today, actually) I am hoping to redo the SSH code with a > different library in the near future. Depending on how that goes, it > would -- in my opinion -- be a good milestone after which to do a new > release, probably 0.1.0 given the magnitude of such a change. > > Otherwise, if that blows up, or if it takes a while and people want a > new release Real Soon Now, or even just for checkpointing reasons > before the big internal change -- we could just take what's in HEAD > and make that 0.0.10 (note: 0.0.10 != 0.1.0). It *has* been some time > since 0.0.9 and there *have* been a whole lot of changes/fixes. The current HEAD would be 0.1.0 because of the compatibility breaking changes to configuration; the set() -> config transition, and maybe other things, like argument parsing. I'd like to keep to a compatibility centered versioning scheme, even if it means that there are no releases between 0.1.0 and 0.2.0 :) It may turn out to be a bad idea, but I don't want to make premature conclusions. > > Again, I cannot speak authoritatively (not until I stage a coup > against Christian's administration, that is) so I'm curious what > Christian's thoughts are. :) > > Regards, > Jeff > -- Venlig hilsen / Kind regards, Christian Vest Hansen. _______________________________________________ Fab-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user
