On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Wes Winham <[email protected]> wrote: > For my particular case, I started out using a bzr lightweight check > and bzr up to do those updates, just as you would expect. There were a > few issues that eventually convinced me that was not the best for my > case: > > <snippity-snip> > > I hope that makes sense. > -Wes
Yea, that made sense, and it sounds like you're definitely hitting a bunch of the scenarios I alluded to :) -Jeff > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Jeff Forcier <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Wes Winham <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I'm super excited about how much rsync is going to speed up my >>> deployment process when I'm just applying small changes. Thanks for >>> the awesome work. >> >> Call me silly, but isn't this what version control is for? Maintain a >> checkout of your release branch (or a release tag) and then just do >> e.g. "svn up" (or "svn switch") during your deploy process. >> >> I'm sure there are plenty of scenarios where that doesn't work, but >> for the common case it seems to be widespread enough to be considered >> best practices *shrug* >> >> At any rate, I'm definitely all for adding flexibility to the builtin >> tools like rsync_project -- so don't think I'm poo-pooing that! -- >> just curious what it may offer over what I'm personally used to. >> >> Best, >> Jeff >> >> P.S. Still cranking away on magic-removal, been relatively busy lately >> but hoping to get back on it full-steam soon! >> > _______________________________________________ Fab-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user
