Forwarding part of a reply that I felt had use for the list at large...
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Chris Withers <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] No 3 yet, but as > more of the libraries I use get there (Pyramid, SQLAlchemy, psycopg2, > mysqldb) I'll be looking to add 3.x and drop 2.5. Should mention here that assuming things look good for us moving to Python 2.6, having Python 3.x compatibility will be a higher priority for us going forwards. Hopefully via the "one codebase that runs on both w/o needing 2to3" approach. > Tasks that (could be) executed locally would be awesome. Is there any > support for that currently? Depends what you mean, but local-only tasks (read: a task that contains no run/sudo/put/get/etc calls, just Python or local()) have been supported literally forever :) If you meant "tasks written with run/sudo which can be automagically executed against a (non ssh-bearing) localhost instead", that's oft-requested but not in yet (though the move to Invoke will bring us closer to it being a reality.) Best, Jeff -- Jeff Forcier Unix sysadmin; Python/Ruby engineer http://bitprophet.org _______________________________________________ Fab-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user
