On 11-Jan-07, at 6:45 PM, Eduardo Cavazos wrote: > > : #foo ( -- ... ) ! Call the value of foo. E.g. "foo" get call
I don't like this. > > In the old vars system, VAR: foo in addition to making getter and > setter > words, also setup up foo to be a symbol. In the system I changed it > so "foo" > is used as the variable. I also don't like this. > The main reason I was defining a symbol foo was to > for let, but I might remove let anyway. You can make let compile, though. > I might make a parsing word for something like let: > > (( a b c )) will expand into >c >b >a > > : foo (( a b c )) > a> b> * a> c> * + b> - ; I don't like this either :-) Slava ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
