Hi All, For the last few weeks when using dynamic variables I've tended to create a new 'accessor' word rather than using 'foo get'.
E.g. I'd do : foo "foo" get ; I don't know what it is about the 'get' word, but for me it seems to interrupt the flow of the code. However I found that using @ in place of get (like forth does) doesn't niggle nearly me as much: : @ get ; foo @ do-something-with-foo Does anybody else find 'get' gets in the way? N.B. I've held off redefining ! for 'set' for the time being (and thus redefining the comment character in the process), mainly because I don't set variables very often and when I do it tends to be in a block at the start of a scope. Cheers, Phil ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
