On Jan 5, 2008 3:38 PM, Slava Pestov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right now, circular dependencies are officially not allowed, but > unofficially they sort of work. > > . . . > > What do you guys think? Is it worth breaking a handful of libs in extra/ > (and making them a tad more complex when fixed) to get 100% correct > refresh-all behavior, and simplify some code? > > Slava
1+ I fell victim to the circular dependency mistake with the file-contents move, and would think it makes sense to make it a rule in order to get correct refresh-all behavior. I only realized that it would cause issues after seeing Dan's thread (and your reply) about the documentation having trouble with it as well, and I had noticed previously that my refresh-all was crashing the workspace. If it simplifies vocab.loader on top of that, I'd say go for it... Aaron "ElasticDog" Schaefer -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
