The stack effect for send is the following:
send ( args... receiver selector -- return... )
I've been staring at this piece of code from cocoa-tests.factor for a
while and I can't reconcile it with the send stack effect:
: test-foo
Foo -> alloc -> init
dup 1.0 2.0 101.0 102.0 <NSRect> -> foo:
-> release ;
I used the walker to inspect the stack, just in case I was missing
something and the stack seems to contain <alien> <alien> <ns-rect>
"foo:" just before invocation.
The signature of foo: is { "id" "SEL" "NSRect" }
"foo:", the selector, is at the top of the stack before invocation but
it's followed by an instance of NSRect (<ns-rect>) whereas the
receiver is <alien>.
Is the stack effect declaration wrong or am I missing something?
Thanks, Joel
--
http://wagerlabs.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
