It seems it's an alignment problem. gcc doesn't seem to align the
double fields to 8 bytes under x86, and factor seems to enforce 8
bytes alignment for doubles. Am I right?
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Jorge Acereda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forgot to say that I'm using the git version on a Mac OS X / x86
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Jorge Acereda Maciá <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I think I'm facing a bug in Factor. I have something like this:
> >
> > TYPEDEF: double PaTime
> >
> > C-STRUCT: PaDeviceInfo
> > { "int" "structVersion" }
> > { "char*" "name" }
> > { "PaHostApiIndex" "hostApi" }
> > { "int" "maxInputChannels" }
> > { "int" "maxOutputChannels" }
> > { "PaTime" "defaultLowInputLatency" }
> > { "PaTime" "defaultLowOutputLatency" }
> > { "PaTime" "defaultHighInputLatency" }
> > { "PaTime" "defaultHighOutputLatency" }
> > { "double" "defaultSampleRate" } ;
> >
> > The C library returns correct values for the PaTime fields and the
> > double field (I checked in GDB). But in Factor, all double values
> > have absurd values.The rest are OK.
> >
> > TIA,
> > Jorge Acereda
> >
> >
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
