On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Slava Pestov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 4, 2008, at 9:20 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Slava Pestov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> By 'very slow' do you mean it times out? It doesn't support HTTP/1.1 > >> properly yet. > > > > I wasn't seeing timeouts a few days ago (just ~10 second response > > times that should have been subsecond) -- but yes, in the latest head > > it is timing out. > > I'm not sure how the ~10 second response times could be explained. How > big were the files you were downloading? Perhaps once I fix the > timeout issue you can give it another whirl.
They were rather small HTML files, probably ~4K, between two hosts on a fast LAN. I've blown away that image, though, so cannot reproduce. Sure, whenever the timeout is fixed I'll give it another try. > > While I'm here: IIRC you had once written that Factor's I/O was > > generally "slow", and I think it was the reason you weren't yet > > participating in the Shootout. I don't remember what specifically was > > slow, just your general statement. Would you still characterize Factor > > that way? > > Factor's I/O was pretty fast at one point but the recent addition of I/ > O encoding support has slowed things down again. Nothing too drastic > though. I will revisit performance soon. In any case, this is only an > issue when reading and writing very large files and such... Thank you! Best, Graham ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
