Hmm... As I see, it is not so hard to map additional stacks into retain stack, but this will work only for top quotation, so additional stacks will not be useful for inner quotations in same lexical scope. For me, looks like some major theoretical problem...
But, as I said in previous letter, availiability of mutable locals withdraws my proposal. Thank you for reply. Maxim Savchenko On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Slava Pestov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Maxim, > > Factor is flexible enough that you can implement your proposal and > play around with it. > > It should be possible to make it efficient too; locals don't have any > support from the compiler either. > > Also note that Factor's locals library supports mutable locals too > (suffix the name with !, and use foo! to write; see the docs for > details). > > Slava ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
