Slava Pestov wrote: > We don't have a macro for Phil's idiom yet. > > Not sure if its worth having an abstraction, but its something to keep > in the back of your mind.
By the way, the 'parallel-call' in 'combinators.lib' is pretty old code and is sorta embarrasing. Here's how it could be written today: : [spread-array] ( seq -- quot ) [ length ] [ ] [ length ] tri '[ , firstn , spread , narray ] ; MACRO: spread-array ( seq -- quot ) [spread-array] ; Ed ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
