Ed, I like the '-here' suffix more than !. It would be nice if it was used more consistently.
I want to avoid any language changes until the compiler is done. Slava On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:36 AM, Eduardo Cavazos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Slava, > > We currently have: > > reverse ( seq -- seq ) > > reverse-here ( seq -- ) > > I'd like to add: > > reverse! ( seq -- seq ) > > and deprecate 'reverse-here'. > > By the way, there are 4 usages of 'reverse-here' and they are all: > > dup reverse-here > > I say "low-impact" because this is an addition; adding 'reverse!' won't break > anything and will make the library more consistent. > > Ed > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Factor-talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
