Slava, The "clipboard-protocol" help article mentions the old accessors 'clipboard-contents' and 'set-clipboard-contents' directly. My guess is that I can mention the 'contents>>' method/accessor instead. But what about the setter? Should I mention the '(>>contents)' generic? It doesn't seem right to give instructions to override '>>contents' since it's not a generic. On the other hand, I thought the '(>>contents)' style setters were considered sort of "behind the scenes". Perhaps for a case like this where you're extending the protocol, it makes sense to talk about this sort of behind the scenes stuff.
Ed ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
