You won't have to resolve words you don't use.
Suppose you have two words, a:foo and b:foo. You will be able to do
USING: a b ;
IN: my-vocab
Without further qualifications, as long as you don't refer to 'foo'.
You'll only have to RESOLVE: a/b foo if you refer to 'foo'. The other
alternative would be to only USE: one of a and b, and use QUALIFIED: for the
other one.
Slava
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Eduardo Cavazos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Slava wrote:
>
> > Let me again propose the feature where if you have a:foo and b:foo, then
> > USING: a b ; foo, you get a parse time error about ambiguity in the
> search
> > order.
>
> What happens if the vocabulary using 'a' and 'b' doesn't refer to 'foo'?
> Will
> the error occur?
>
> That would be mighty annoying if I'm using some vocabularies and have to
> RESOLVE: words that I don't even use.
>
> Ed
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Factor-talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
