Slava,
At the listener, if you do:
USE: quux
and the 'quux' vocabulary exists on disk, it's loaded. However, if you do:
IN: quux
the vocabulary on disk is ignored and a new 'quux' vocabulary is created in
memory.
I wonder if 'IN: quux' should:
Switch to 'quux' if the vocabulary exists in memory.
Check if it exists on disk, load it, then switch to it.
Otherwise, just create a new vocabulary 'quux'.
I'm not fond of changing things lightly. Just throwing this out there. I do
like that the semantics of 'IN:' are so lightweight. I could always throw
together a word that does the above.
Ed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
