Eduardo Cavazos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Does that make any sense?
>
> Yup. And the nice thing is that it looks like a solid strategy in that it's
> what somebody would do manually, and in that respect, the above should always
> work.
Excellent.
> Well, 'in' doesn't represent a list like 'use' does so pushing and poping
> from
> it doesn't make sense. However, you could have your own stack for
> saving/restoring 'in'. Something like:
>
> : in-stack V{ } ;
>
> : save-in in get in-stack push ;
>
> : restore-in in-stack pop in set ;
>
> But it sounds like you don't need something even that elaborate.
Well, since i'm starting to write some factor support code anyway, i can
use the above, together with a 'with-vocab' word just for kicks :)
Thanks for the feedback.
Cheers,
jao
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
