Jean-François Bigot wrote:

> 2. Rx, Ry Rz
> 
> Your solution is nice but very long. I would prefer to see 
> "deep-cleave-quots" word back. It was the nicest solution I saw.

I agree that the versions using 'deep-cleave-quots' were very nice. 
Unfortunately 'deep-cleave-quots' was a casualty of 'bake' being removed 
from extra. Last I heard, the functionality of 'bake' is going to be 
merged into fry, so hopefully we'll get this word back.

Ed

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk

Reply via email to