Hi All,
Factor style question: Is it ok to use spread combinators in places
where subsequent quots use results from the previous ones? I like the
symmetry it brings:
(fictitious example:)
: lop-off-back ( seq start -- seq' )
1+ head ;
: lop-off-front ( seq len -- seq' )
short tail* ;
: window ( seq start window-width -- subseq )
[ lop-off-front ] [ lop-off-back ] bi* ;
vs
: window ( seq start window-width -- subseq )
[ lop-off-front ] dip lop-off-back ;
but obviously it wouldn't work if the quots weren't executed sequentially.
What do you think?
Cheers,
Phil
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
