Hi Jeremy, This issue is fixed in the latest GIT sources. Sorry for the delay.
Slava On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a struct foo: > > C-STRUCT: foo > { "char*" "name" } > { "bool" "on" } > { "short" "parents" } > { "void*" "fn1" } > { "void*" "fn2" } > { "ushort" "flags" } ; > > On mac ppc, access to this via foo-<member> works fine. On 64 bit linux the > offset the c++ library uses is different to what factor expects. > > The c++ code returns a struct where the "parents" value has an offset of > 10. Factor expects an offset of 12: > > "parents" "Class" offset-of ===> 12 > > I could work around this on a per platform basis, but I'm curious as to > whether > there is a better way. > > Cheers, > > Jeremy > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations > Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of > expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry > leaders in dedicated Performance & Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf > and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf > _______________________________________________ > Factor-talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
