On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Phil Dawes <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Slava, > > Yep, these forwarding functions should probably just be a 1 line macro: > PRIMITIVE_FORWARD(exit);
Something like that would work, yes. > (although if the vm struct gets split out into a tree of objects they > would end up being something like PRIMITIVE_FORWARD(dataheap,gc). I think primitives will still take a VM struct in this case, and will be defined as methods on the VM object. > Is that what you're after or do you have a better idea? It might be best if primitives weren't methods on the VM object at all. Slava ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
