Paul Moore wrote: > 2009/10/30 Phil Dawes <[email protected]>: > > I wonder, could you use a named pipe (I know Factor already uses named > pipes under the hood) and pass around the name, so that each client > can open a write handle of its own on the pipe? That way, you don't > have a single port/handle for all clients. In effect, run > "open-other-end" in each client separately.
I tried that, but couldn't get more than one writer to successfully open the named-pipe. Do you know if this is possible? (I didn't spend much time on that so maybe there's a flag I was missing) Having the write end block while it sends appears to work ok so I guess I'll revisit this if that turns out to be a latency problem. Thanks again! Phil ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
