On Aug 19, 2011, at 8:30 PM, Andrew Pennebaker wrote: > It would really be neat if you didn't have to use INCLUDE/INCLUDING for user > code and USE/USING for Factor's standard library code.
The differences are: - INCLUDE: looks only in the current directory; USE: looks in the search path - INCLUDE: looks for foo/bar.factor; USE: looks for foo/bar/bar.factor It wouldn't be difficult to include the current directory in the default search path. USE: could also conceivably look for vocab "foo.bar" at "foo/bar.factor" in addition to "foo/bar/bar.factor", which would be convenient for small projects, but I don't know how deeply the one-vocab:one-directory assumption is in the vocab infrastructure. Slava would. -Joe
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2
_______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
