The style could be better, but we're lacking a bunch of words I'd want for
working with matrices efficiently. We'd need real n-dimensional arrays like
numpy has to do it properly, which is what I started in arrays.shaped. Also
remove-nth seems to be backwards from what I needed.
Doug
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Leonard P <leonard14...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Doug Coleman <doug.cole...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> If you interested in finding the determinant of a matrix, the easiest way
>> is probably to bind to LAPACK or LINPACK using our Fortran FFI. Take a look
>> at extra/math/blas/ffi for an example.
>>
>
>
>> If you have time, try adding a more efficient version to arrays.shaped?
>> (Or bind to LINPACK or implement a better algorithm!)
>>
>> Have fun,
>> Doug
>>
>
> Not too concerned about efficiency. Don't even need the algorithm for any
> particular reason. More interested in the beauty of idiomatic
> concatenative style. (Did this once back in the day in C with malloc and
> pointers)
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
> Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
> and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
> _______________________________________________
> Factor-talk mailing list
> Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
