That would be a great thing to have in core. I like FFI wrappers as quick
ways to get new features -- be interesting to compare it with a native
parser (EBNF?) sometime.
Best,
John.
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Jon Harper <jon.harpe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> There have been discussions about using YAML recently (for example to use
> in the package system described here
> https://gist.github.com/jckarter/3440892)
>
> As a first step, I just wrote a simple test to call LibYAMLthrough the
> FFI. You can view the code here:
> https://github.com/jonenst/factor/compare/master...yaml
>
> Would libYAML (http://pyyaml.org/wiki/LibYAML) be a good way to achieve
> this objective ?
>
> Cheers,
> Jon
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
> _______________________________________________
> Factor-talk mailing list
> Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
