2013/7/15 Alex Vondrak <ajvond...@gmail.com>
>
> In general, I'm not sure if html.parser is very mature compared to, say,
> the XML vocab: http://docs.factorcode.org/content/article-xml.html
The major difference is that html.parser handles invalid html which the xml
vocab doesn't. So for parsing pages on the web, html.parser is what you
have to use. Would be great if someone wrote a wrapper for libxml2 which is
the best xml/html parsing library ever. Then you wouldn't need to use
different interfaces for xml and html.
--
mvh Björn
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
