It's not broken, it's kinda an implementation detail of related-words. If you
look at the code for $related it checks for a "related" word-prop. To generate
a see-also list.
> On Dec 14, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Alexander Ilin <ajs...@yandex.ru> wrote:
>
> `related-words` does work, no question.
> I'm talking specifically about `$related`, which seems to be broken.
>
> 14.12.2016, 00:38, "John Benediktsson" <mrj...@gmail.com>:
>> Look at `related-words`.
>>
>>> On Dec 14, 2016, at 12:51 AM, Alexander Ilin <ajs...@yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> `$related` doesn't seem to work for me. Can anyone verify?
>>>
>>> I'm doing this:
>>>
>>> HELP: (go)
>>> { $description "Implementation of the " { $link go } " word without
>>> checking the current speed." }
>>> { $related go } ;
>>>
>>> I expect to see the "See also" section in the `(go)` article with the
>>> `go` entry in it, but that doesn't happen.
>>>
>>> Searching through the codebase I can see not a single use of the
>>> `$related`. Is it broken?
>
> ---=====---
> Александр
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Factor-talk mailing list
> Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
