Hello, Björn!
Thanks for the explanation! I've already lost hope of seeing a reply to that, but you appeared out of nowhere and saved the day. Thank you!
Are you saying there was a different (better?) optimizer in the previous Factor releases? What happened to it?
17.01.2018, 22:25, "Björn Lindqvist" <bjou...@gmail.com>:
r14 contains the datastack top pointer. It is incremented by 0x10 which is 16 bytes or 2 cells. Your code was supposed to put two items on the stack, but then the optimizer did a great job and noticed that the values didn't have to be put on the stack but could be kept in registers. But it didn't optimize away the stack increment/decrement. Possibly, the optimizer in 0.96 or 0.97 did a better job at optimizing code like that.
---=====---
Александр
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Factor-talk mailing list Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
