On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Matthias Fechner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 29.04.2015 um 15:46 schrieb Richard Mealing:
> > So, is it sqlite causing these problems? Should I try using memory
> instead?
>
> I have exactly the same problems on FreeBSD 10.1.
> Lets wait for new version.
>
If you want to try with 0.9.2, here are two diffs for
/usr/ports/security/py-fail2ban:
--- Makefile.orig 2015-05-06 17:59:12.289683084 -0700
+++ Makefile 2015-05-06 23:42:48.490967341 -0700
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# $FreeBSD: head/security/py-fail2ban/Makefile 381426 2015-03-16 17:00:05Z
sunpoet $
PORTNAME= fail2ban
-PORTVERSION= 0.9.1
+PORTVERSION= 0.9.2
CATEGORIES= security python
PKGNAMEPREFIX= ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
USE_GITHUB= yes
GH_ACCOUNT= ${PORTNAME}
GH_PROJECT= ${PORTNAME}
-GH_COMMIT= 2ab2bd8
+GH_COMMIT= 880e666
GH_TAGNAME= ${PORTVERSION}
USES= python
--- distinfo.orig 2015-05-06 23:33:37.488776840 -0700
+++ distinfo 2015-05-06 23:33:46.923400804 -0700
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-SHA256 (fail2ban-0.9.1.tar.gz) =
8ad1135d4669d5fb0890f364880a4125ff793a39084100b80b65e52ab19deb78
-SIZE (fail2ban-0.9.1.tar.gz) = 299033
+SHA256 (fail2ban-0.9.2.tar.gz) =
3e002f916e71128d4d7a97354b3e9b3bc20add878c9aa29c4034744de6156893
+SIZE (fail2ban-0.9.2.tar.gz) = 314919
> I've been running 0.9.2 without an issue since yesterday afternoon, but
we'll see if that holds up.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Fail2ban-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users
