Understood. Thank you, I will check that.

Em qui., 9 de fev. de 2023 às 16:42, Nick Howitt via Fail2ban-users <
fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net> escreveu:

> If the three lines port, logpath and backend are the same in jail.conf,
> you don't need them in jail.local. Jail.local only overrides the parameters
> you specify otherwise it gets them from jail.conf.
>
> On 09/02/2023 19:34, Marcos A.T. Silva wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So, regarding jail.local and sshd jail, the content is below:
>
> [sshd]
>
> # To use more aggressive sshd modes set filter parameter "mode" in
> jail.local:
> # normal (default), ddos, extra or aggressive (combines all).
> # See "tests/files/logs/sshd" or "filter.d/sshd.conf" for usage example
> and details.
> #mode   = normal
> port    = ssh
> logpath = %(sshd_log)s
> backend = %(sshd_backend)s
> enabled  = true
>
> I think the above is overriding jail.conf. As the jail.conf file does not
> have a line `enabled` (with true or false values) for any of the jails, I
> also suppose anyway that jail.local is overriding that. Is this right?
>
> Em qui., 9 de fev. de 2023 às 15:59, Nick Howitt via Fail2ban-users <
> fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net> escreveu:
>
>> There is some misinformation here. Jails can be enabled via configlets in
>> jail.d/ as well as overrides in jail.local.
>>
>> Anyway, what is your full jail config in jail.local? All you need is:
>> [sshd]
>> enabled = true
>>
>> It will pull everything else from jail.conf. Anything else you put here
>> will override anything in jail.conf so it is up to you if you want to
>> accept the default settings in jail.conf or override them.
>>
>>
>> On 09/02/2023 18:45, Marcos A.T. Silva wrote:
>>
>> Hi Finn,
>>
>> Understood. Thank you very much. :)
>>
>> I think I'll learn this one day. Well, it seems things are starting to
>> work here.
>>
>> So, do you know how can I make sure that a jail is really running?
>> Because, for example, I've enabled the sshd jail. The enabled jail is as
>> below:
>>
>> ```
>> #mode   = normal
>> port    = ssh
>> logpath = %(sshd_log)s
>> backend = %(sshd_backend)s
>> enabled  = true
>> ```
>>
>> Is the above jail correct? Do I have to put a "filter" part there or
>> uncomment the #mode?
>>
>> Well, I don't know if I am testing it right. But, for example, if I run
>> `fail2ban-client status sshd` I receive the below output:
>>
>> ```
>> Status for the jail: sshd
>> |- Filter
>> |  |- Currently failed: 1
>> |  |- Total failed:     1
>> |  `- File list:        /var/log/auth.log
>> `- Actions
>>   |- Currently banned: 0
>>   |- Total banned:     0
>>   `- Banned IP list:
>>
>> ```
>>
>> But I think I've tried to login at the server with a wrong passphrase for
>> my SSH key twice, and Fail2Ban is only displaying one attempt. Is this
>> correct?
>>
>> Thanks again, and sorry for the disturbance.
>>
>> Em qui., 9 de fev. de 2023 às 15:34, fail2ban--- via Fail2ban-users <
>> fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net> escreveu:
>>
>>> Hi Marcos
>>>
>>> jail.conf is holding the default settings for the jails
>>>
>>> jail.local is where You make Your own settings and customizations.
>>>
>>> When You update fail2ban jail.conf may be altered but jail.local will
>>> not and therfore settings (enabled kails etc. will be safe)
>>>
>>> A good idea is to read through the /etc/fail2ban/*.conf files since the
>>> makers has included a lot of informations between the lines - some are
>>> difficult to understand the first time but eventually You will get
>>> better knowledge and understanding of this nice and GREAT tool.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> /Finn
>>>
>>>
>>> Den 09-02-2023 kl. 19:05 skrev Marcos A.T. Silva:
>>> > Well, I have installed Fail2Ban from my own once I get this new Ubuntu
>>> > server. I am using Ubuntu 20.04.
>>> >
>>> > I only got this working by setting jails as enabled in the jail.local
>>> > file. The individual files in jail.d directory don't work.
>>> >
>>> > Em qui., 9 de fev. de 2023 às 14:44, Nick Howitt via Fail2ban-users
>>> > <fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> > <mailto:fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net>> escreveu:
>>> >
>>> >     Surely jail.conf should be left in place as it it supplies some
>>> >     defaults, especially if you are using a distro packaged version? I
>>> >     don't think any jails are enabled by default but it may depend on
>>> >     the distro.
>>> >
>>> >     Then use jail.local or files in jail.d/ to enable particular
>>> filters.
>>> >
>>> >     Nick
>>> >
>>> >     On 09/02/2023 17:31, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
>>> >>     On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 12:11 PM Marcos A.T. Silva<
>>> marcos...@gmail.com>  <mailto:marcos...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> >>>     Hi there,
>>> >>>
>>> >>>     I really can't find enough words to express my gratitude to you
>>> all guys. :)
>>> >>>
>>> >>>     I think I am finally putting this to work.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>     All your suggestions and help made me understand, I think, how
>>> that works.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>     I've done the following:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>     1) Once, for what I understood, jail.local always overrides
>>> jail.conf, I left all jails disabled (false) on jail.local. After that,
>>> I've renamed jail.conf to jail.conf.unused, as Lee suggested.
>>> >>>
>>> >>            AFAIK jail.conf does not turn anything on; that is the job
>>> of
>>> >>     jail.local and/or jail.d/something-here.conf
>>> >>
>>> >>>     2) Now I created a sshd.conf file in /etc/fail2ban/jail.d and
>>> put there only the content regarding the sshd jail that was in my
>>> jail.local, enabling this jail.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>     3) Finally I tried to start Fail2Ban and it worked! Thank you!
>>> >>>
>>> >>>     Well, I noticed (maybe I am wrong, of course) that I need to use
>>> both `sudo fail2ban-client start` and `sudo systemctl start fail2ban` to
>>> make it start and be enabled. Is that right?
>>> >>>
>>> >>            systemctl start fail2ban should have sufficed.
>>> >>
>>> >>>     But I rebooted the server and systemctl status shows me that
>>> Fail2Ban is still active.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>     Another question, if possible: now I have only sshd jail active,
>>> as per the above procedures. Is there a way to check if it is really
>>> running?
>>> >>>
>>> >>     fail2ban-client status sshd
>>> >>
>>> >>>     Thanks again.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>     Em qui., 9 de fev. de 2023 às 12:13, Mauricio Tavares<
>>> raubvo...@gmail.com>  <mailto:raubvo...@gmail.com>  escreveu:
>>> >>>>     On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 10:11 AM L. V. Lammert<l...@omnitec.net>
>>> <mailto:l...@omnitec.net>  wrote:
>>> >>>>>     On Thu, 9 Feb 2023, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>>            My suggestion is to find which services you are using
>>> and then
>>> >>>>>>     where they are writing their logs to. Take a look at
>>> jail.conf (I
>>> >>>>>>     forgot to mention that file). Chances are there are entries
>>> for most
>>> >>>>>>     of the services there. Case in point, the ssh services,
>>> including
>>> >>>>>>     selinux-ssh, it knows of are
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>     It appears that the fail2ban package for Ubuntu 20 is NOT very
>>> current.
>>> >>>>>     Much simpler to manage if all of the jails are in separate
>>> files in
>>> >>>>>     jail.d, .. not in a mile long jail.conf.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>     Also, always confirm the installation of ONLY ssh, until you
>>> know what you
>>> >>>>>     need to monitor.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>     FYI
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>     raub@some-debian-box:~$ cat
>>> /etc/fail2ban/jail.d/defaults-debian.conf
>>> >>>>     [sshd]
>>> >>>>     enabled = true
>>> >>>>     raub@some-debian-box:~$
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>>              Lee
>>> >>     _______________________________________________
>>> >>     Fail2ban-users mailing list
>>> >>     Fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net  <mailto:
>>> Fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>> >>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users  <
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users>
>>> >
>>> >     _______________________________________________
>>> >     Fail2ban-users mailing list
>>> >     Fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> >     <mailto:Fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>> >     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users
>>> >     <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Fail2ban-users mailing list
>>> > Fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users
>>>
>>> --
>>> "After sleeping through a hundred million centuries we have finally
>>> opened our eyes on a sumptuous planet, sparkling with color, bountiful
>>> with life. Within decades we must close our eyes again. Isn't it a
>>> noble, an enlightened way of spending our brief time in the sun, to work
>>> at understanding the universe and how we have come to wake up in it?"
>>> [- Professor Richard Dawkins]
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Fail2ban-users mailing list
>>> Fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fail2ban-users mailing 
>> listFail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fail2ban-users mailing list
>> Fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fail2ban-users mailing list
> Fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users
>
_______________________________________________
Fail2ban-users mailing list
Fail2ban-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users

Reply via email to