--- akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], akasha_108 > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], > > "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Tom T: > > > In reading the long discussion between Rory and > Akasha about yours > > > truly I am flattered that so much bandwidth has > been taken up in light > > > of how really unimportant I am in the grand > scale. On the other hand > > > it seems to be that Akasha and Vaj are > definitely working on a > > > definition of CC, GC and UC that does not fit > what the TMO has been > > > handing down for years. > > > > >I am not saying that the TMO has it right, but > > > it is the one I have been using as I believe > Rory has used. > > > > > > > > Tom, I am not sure if this is a humor post. I > don't get the joke, but > > if your points are serious they are odd to say the > least. > > > > For clarity sake, can you summarize your view of > what you think > > i) Vaj and or I have said about CC, > > > > ii) what the TMO has said, and > > > > iii) what Rory holds to be the truth. > > > > Without such clarification, I guess I just have to > laugh off your post > > as an intended joke, but one I don't get. > > > On second thought Tom, no need to do that. I am > clear on the TMO > definition and my own. > > The larger point of most of my posts on this topic > is that labels and > categories, and the activity of labeling and > classifying experiences > and understandings is silly, or at least not very > productive. See my > earlier posts if you care to read my thoughts on > this. > > If labeling your self and others in this or that way > makes you happy, > then be happy.
I think the discussion has value not in statically labeling and creating a stand-alone conceptual system, but in a dynamic conceptual-experiential interaction. Often I feel, akasha, that you are seeking some sort of completely contradiction-free, coherent conceptual system of higher states of consciousness. I see this as impossible due to the foundational shift as consciousness becomes increasingly aware of itself. There is no place to "stand" to view it other than itself. And this "itself" has no place to stand within it! -Peter > > > > > > > > To subscribe, send a message to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Or go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ > and click 'Join This Group!' > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
