I agree, but part of me reserves judgment due to a reluctance to make my ethical value absolute.
on 4/1/05 6:09 AM, shanti2218411 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > ---Rick no doubt reasonable people can sometimes argue about what is > ethical behavior but I think in the case of the teachers I refered to > below I have no doubt that most people would agree that they behaved > unethically because by any reasonable standard they did. eg taking > advantage of their status as teachers to sexually exploit their > students or using their students desire to become enlightened to make > unreasonable demands on them.Kevin > > > > > In [email protected], Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> on 3/31/05 7:44 PM, shanti2218411 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> ---Not to defend MMY's unethical behavior(because I believe that he >>> has behaved that way)I think that it's worth mentioning that numerous >>> other ostensibly enlightened beings have behaved unethically including >>> several prominent buddhist teachers.All of which leads me to conclude >>> that maybe we need to come up with another definition of what it means >>> to be enlightened. >> >> Or ethical. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
