On Apr 2, 2005, at 11:58 PM, mark robert wrote:

> In light of your failure to explain yourself, I shall assume that you
> are unable to support what you implied: that PET scans indicate that
> coke and pot users sustain more brain damage than alcohol users.
>
>

I never said that coke and pot users sustain more brain damage than
alcohol users. Anything that effects cerebral perfusion will be
reflected in a PET scan using FDG, a tracer which shows how the brain
uses these fine sugars. For example, this is used in meditation
research to show changes to the brain.

Don't you know how to use a search engine?



----------------------

 

 

 

Vaj,

 

You are correct; a PET scan will only show activity/inactivity. Thank you for thereby admitting that your original implication was misleading.

 

Regarding exactly what you and I have said here, it is there for all to see.

 

I don’t know why you asked about my searching ability. I was only asking you to clarify your post. Your tardy response would indicate that you were the one that took a long time to google PET scans.  

 

Do you drink alcohol?

 

-Mark

 

 

 




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to