Relax, rudra_joe

The nurses are on their way with your medication.


--- In [email protected], "rudra_joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peterklutz:
> 
> The TMO is a mirage; it does not exist; it's the battle field where
> the forces of light find themselves involved in a struggle with the
> forces of darkness.
> 
> RJ:
> 
> The TMO doesn't exist, and won't exist much longer, and yet won't
exist again in the future. A perpetual nonmovement always teetering on
the abyss. Maharishi is the one locked in the dualism of struggle of
light and dark. In reality, light and dark must both exist or the
Earth will burst into flames or freeze into night.  Buck light or dark
and the battle is for survival, but light and dark prop each other
like two dear friends. 
> 
> All this motive force to fight a shadow, a shadow which is the world
animus and the source of possiblity. Those who buck the dark, are
afraid of it!
> 
> Dark is not evil, it is sooth. Evil is evil. Analogies are ignorant.
Evil, dark, black are not synonyms. The forces of light are not moral
forces but mere reflections, we humans are moral arbiters in our
choices.  For us, motive is usually against our inner scapegoat and
towards our ideal of perfection. But that scapegoat of our repressed
evils is not the darkness itself which is the chocolate of life.  No,
evil is our take on the darkness and our moral inability to bring the
dark to light in a responsible and creative manner utilizing
destruction for removing the obstructions of the dark. Hence
Sivaratri, dark practices, cycles of the dark moon, et coagula. 
> 
> Using the dark is a moral and human choice to liberate or enslave,
through self realization or mere glamour and advertising.  In Kaballah
the otiginal sphere of the Ain is dark, and the sphere of
understanding Binah is dark.  In Dao Yin is dark.  In these things
dark is the complement to wisdom and perception. If one looks through
light at a clear sky into light then there is no perspective (actually
that's not true at all, hence togal)  But for the analogy, if one
looks into the clear blue sky then they see basically space and
nothing, but with the dark one sees forever with perspective and
stars. this doesn't equate with evil.
> 
> In fact, those are the most evil who cannot accept the dark and live
with it and nurture it but who in fact try to erase it through
violence and conquest. The light has been the source of more death and
destruction than the dark. Make no mistake. Because people don't know
how to use or are afraid fof the dark.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to