--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 11, 2005, at 2:04 PM, off_world_beings wrote: > > > ""So if you have a technique that brings waves of bliss crashing > > through the walls, and that you can literally 'see' repairing and > > enhancing neurological connections in your brain while you sleep, > > and that actually improves your spine and heals the cells in your > > body spontaneously, and you can personally feel this very > > concretely, > > Did you learn that this was part of the path or that this was the goal? > If part of the path, how does applying this as the path expect to get > you where you want to go? If as the goal, you're already there, so why > do you have to ask?>>>
If you are talking about the above , then healing is of course part of the path I would think, no? > > > and this new awareness gained from said technique,allows > > you to see directly (even during sleep) into the pure zone of > > existence that underlies the cosmos, and perceive clearly the pure > > bliss that is so intense it is almost scary, > > How do you think that this level of insight and that level of bliss > help in the path? How is insight applied as the path? How is bliss > applied as the path? Or was this your goal? If yes, that was your goal, > why are you asking, you are already there? You set up criteria, and if such a goal is reached under the self- analysis criteria that you set up, then if said goal is reached, can you ascertain that the path you took was a right path? > > > and a technique that > > allows your body to feel incredibly weightless and to hop > > effortlessly, without physical intention, in lotus, in a kind of > > incredible, blissful, purifying, powerful, and almost miraculous > > way. If this is one's real and concrete experiences.......then, > > under the afore-mentioned criteria, should one consider that > > technique worthy of following?"" > > How are real and concrete experiences applied as the path? An > "experience" implies a duality or an "experience" and an "experiencer" > and a "process" between the two. Were you hoping to find duality? If > so, why are you asking me--you're already there. > > -V.>>> So having got there (to as much a degree as is necessary for my intellect to be unable to go backwards...into non-eternal consciousness. It is impossible for me to not see eternity of life, and the creator in it), then can one conclude with some surity that the path was one worthy of speaking of? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
