Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Length: 6246
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
X-Yahoo-Post-IP: 69.66.136.136
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-compose
X-Yahoo-GPoster: AI9asjv4yJFd4X1W

Democracy Without Borders

Rami G. Khouri

April 13, 2005

Rami G. Khouri is editor at large of the Beirut-based Daily Star newspaper,=
 published 
throughout the Middle East with the International Herald Tribune.

____________________


I have spent the last three days in Doha, Qatar, participating in a rich di=
scussion among 
150 Americans and citizens from Islamic countries around the world, which h=
as clarified a 
few important trends in American-Islamic world relations. The center of gra=
vity of the 
public debate about the Arab-Islamic world, and between Americans and Musli=
ms, is 
slowly shifting. It is moving away from wars for regime change and clashes =
of civilizations, 
into a discussion of democracy and reform. Most intriguingly and significan=
tly, a core 
issue in this global debate became more clear to me and many other particip=
ants here at 
the U.S.-Islamic World Forum, organized by the State of Qatar and the Saban=
 Center for 
Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C. It is t=
he issue of 
whether, and how, to include Islamist parties and groups in the democratic =
process.


As Arab and Islamic societies become more democratic, the most credible, or=
ganized and 
legitimate groups in society are likely to be Islamist parties like Hezboll=
ah, Hamas and the 
Muslim Brotherhood. If they are denied participation in elections=97or denied=
 incumbency if 
they win=97the democratic process will prove to be a sham. But, it is also as=
ked, can they 
participate in politics and share in power if they remain armed? Significan=
tly, the core of 
the debate now is not about whether these groups should participate politic=
ally, but how 
they can do so in a manner that is acceptable to all concerned.


Other dimensions of the shifting debate are also clearer these days. These =
include greater 
stress on how to promote reform in Arab-Asian-Islamic societies, expand the=
 circle of 
participants in pluralistic, democratic politics, adjust economic and educa=
tional policies to 
support development and security, and understand better the centrality for =
Arabs and 
Muslims of resolving the Palestine issue fairly.


Participants here frankly aired and debated their views, but in=A0a spirit an=
d context that 
were markedly different from similar gatherings in previous years. Democrat=
ic reforms 
have more rapidly emerged as the central pivot around which most of the dis=
cussion now 
revolves, while the mutual criticisms and complaints remain largely the sam=
e.


Political leaders and civil society activists need to grasp and act on this=
 novelty: the 
promotion of democracy and economic reforms in Arab-Islamic countries provi=
des an 
unprecedented opportunity for people from both societies to work together f=
or goals they 
share, to redress problems they both suffer from, and to achieve results th=
at will benefit 
them all. Never in recent generations have Arabs, Americans and Muslims bee=
n able to 
rally around a single, shared political goal that they all perceive to be l=
egitimate, urgent, 
useful and practicable.


Much has happened in the three years since the 9/11 attacks against targets=
 in the United 
States, the two years since the United States used its armed forces to chan=
ge the regimes 
in two Islamic countries, and=A0more than=A0a decade after the "clash of civili=
zations" question 
was raised by Samuel Huntington. The small but clear shifts in the core dis=
course between 
concerned Americans and Muslims and Arabs has been in the making for=A0more t=
han=A0a 
decade. It has only been clarified in the past=A0nine months or so, due to a =
combination of 
factors.


Some of the most important ones include:


American-engineered deeds and failures in Iraq;

Washington's predatory, aggressive global policy since 9/11, and the world'=
s equally 
strong defiance and resistance to unilateral American militarism; the slow =
reconciliation 
and revived partnership for global action between the United 
States=A0and Europe; more dynamic indigenous Arab movements for democratic ch=
ange and 
freedom in response to collective Arab mediocrity in the governance field; =
a stronger 
American embrace of the policy of promoting freedom and democracy; fears ab=
out the 
growing scourge and expanding scope of terrorism; and, a global emphasis on=
 the 
centrality of resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict for promoting 
other mutually identified goals in the Arab-Islamic world.

The shifts are discernible but not gigantic, significant but not yet decisi=
ve. They are 
important to acknowledge and nurture, however, because they may offer the e=
dge of a thin 
thread that Americans, Arabs, Asians and Muslims can grasp and weave into a=
 strong rope 
that can pull them all out of their cycle of anger, fear and war. This is a=
 challenge that will 
require the best of Americans and citizens and leaders in Islamic societies=
.

An important element in the slow change that may be taking place in how Ame=
ricans and 
Arabs/Muslims deal with each other is a growing appreciation for the fact t=
hat the rules of 
internal democracy in one country must apply to relations among countries=97a=
nd the 
expansion of democratic societies around the world. Specifically=97as many Ar=
abs and 
Muslims repeatedly told Americans here this week=97all countries have to abid=
e by a 
universal set of rules and norms, just as all citizens of a democracy shoul=
d enjoy equal 
rights and obligations.

This means that the United States and Israel, for example, cannot set their=
 own rules on 
issues related to security or weapons of mass destruction proliferation, an=
d expect the 
rest of the world to accept lower standards of security or national rights.=
 A credible 
democratic culture, it was stressed here, requires that all citizens within=
 a state, as well as 
all countries in the world, abide by common legal norms.

We are far from achieving this condition, but movement is toward that direc=
tion=97and 
toward closer positions, after many years of Arabs, Americans and Muslims m=
oving in 
different directions and often shooting each other on the way.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to