|
It is interesting in how it represents the culmination of medieval Vaishnavism overtaking the original traditions and then representing that to westerners (primarily Judeo-Christians) as the original or "pure" tradition. Vaishnavite deviations of Hinduism are much more palatable to westerners. ---You think? I only thought that most religions were palatable to Christians and Jews because they were mostly reprehensible, and therefore the Judeochristian could feel superior, and that meant they didn't have to rise up in arms to persecute. On the other hand, a purer religion would make those people very scared and would make them start a crusade. Imagine a Christian carrying any other banner than Jesus, even if the truth would set them free. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links
|
