--- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Profound as that is, perhaps your literalness can be softened a bit > by > > rephrasing: snakes natures will be snakes natures. But that sounds > > sort of awkward. But any way I can help you to get it, I will do. > > Let me put this as simply as I can. Snakes' natures is not to be.
gosh, i get it now. As i did 10 posts ago. As i did in my original post using the snake reference -- which it appears you either misread or misunderstood. but this horse is dead i think (just think how the queen feels.) ut oh, now we will have 10 posts on how the horse is not real. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
