Yes. For example, I feel good because I just finished a
great lunch, to which I can say without doubt I am
attached. I cannot seem to get away from eating. It
has me by the throat, as it were.
 
---Practical advice, always offer the last and best bite to Guru. For someone else.

> Or is it a lure toward joy, from which it is might be
> easier to make the leap to pure consciousness? 

Vaj said it well the other day -- "the more intense the
bliss-sensation, the more intense levels of emptiness
(which is what the bliss is riding on top of) one can fathom."
 
---Basically doesn't matter one way or the other as one writer said, "if toothache or ice cream then which one first."

> Doesn't joy chagne the physiology so that the leap is easier?

I think Deepak Chopra and Maharishi might say so. And
so would Patrick Gillam, for all that.

- PJG
 
What leap as there is only the emptiness, and then the bliss for the gap wherein we reside, with its suchness, and then the manifestation of bliss. There can be no other unless your karma is extremely skewed. Then of course some reintegration is needed. In this case the means justify the ends. The greatest means is to sing and dance. create peace on the level of peace. If a man could dance faster than another could fight then the fighter would be worn down while the dance would just be smiling and having a good time. Bliss is the direct means to peace through nonattachment to the specifics. But attachment to the whole. Consider Capoiera.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to