Na, your overstating it. All Maharishi wants is to avoid any 
embarrassing situations. He wants to be as far removed from the 
Hippy free love stigma as possible. He is quite right in this 
regard, because critics (such as you) will POUNCE and never stop 
talking about some rumor of something. If he hadn't had different 
domes for example, it would have happened a long time ago that some 
a-hole would have had news articles all over the place that they 
were having hippy orgies in there .

Anyway, every intelligent person knows that men are just deformed x 
chromosones. One part of the x got shrivelled somewhere along the 
way and males came about. It will eventually revert back to the 
perfect x, and all creatures will be androgenous (as more than 50% 
of the species on the planet are)


--- In [email protected], "Llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> C'mon man. I never had the slightest problem being checked by a 
woman. How are you going to judge this as it implies that you are 
there during other people's checking during the few times where a 
woman is involved. 
> 
> Man, you guys have no clue. Don't you know that to dishonor woman 
is the very reason that a religion is destroyed? And the religion is 
destroyed through that very dishonor because no marriages and 
alliances are formed and therefore no progeny are produced and so 
therefore no religion is transmitted. 
> 
> Criticize womanhood if you must.  You know, this topic is 
disgusting to follow for any tantrika. Everyone is so quick to 
approve Mahareeshees judgements and pronouncements. Maharishi cannot 
truely or correctly say anything about women as he has no knowledge 
of them whatsoever, whatsoever. 
> 
> So are you saying Vasti that you have never had a settled 
meditation because you were taught by a woman?  Sad. But the 
thinking is even sadder. Sucker. Look, I'm sorry for shouting out 
fag and sucker.  I mean, just because that's what most renunciates 
turn into is besides the point I guess. Male love is the great open 
secret of India.  And probably preferable in the eyes of the 
Maharishi to male/female love. 
> 
> Because male female love is distinctly satisfying like putting 
ones feet on the ground after a long cramped bus ride, and it's good 
for present happiness but it detracts from ---------focused 
proselitarian commercial enterprise, Ie., money through conversions. 
> 
> Those who are into women cannot be into Maharishi in the way he 
wants, that is, money money money bling bling bling. Because 
families are expensive. No, much better to be celibate and have no 
contact with women, because then all that extra energy flows into 
the coffers.  No truely power craving Mongol will court the 
householder because they are more content than the celibate who 
usually is just a walking hardon with no outlet. Critical? Ever been 
on Purusha?
> 
> Again I tell ye, that heaven will not come on earth unless ye 
throw out your celibate ways. ;)
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: easyone200 
>   To: [email protected] 
>   Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 1:37 AM
>   Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: News from the TM Front
> 
> 
> 
>   --- In [email protected], Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>   > on 4/23/05 11:21 PM, vashtirama at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>   > > 
>   > > It has introduced some doubt, at that finest feeling level, 
in the
>   > > quality of the TM instruction I originally received, because 
my
>   > > initiator was of a different sex from me. But maybe all male
>   > > initiators are, in some subtle way, better, since they were 
trained
>   > > by MMY who is of their same sex.
>   > 
>   > My initiator was Charlotte Peters, an older Austrian woman. 
I'm not worried
>   > in the least about the quality of my instruction. I got my 
money's worth,
>   > and then some. Maharishi just has an issue with the mixing of 
the sexes,
>   > cause it didn't work out so well for him personally (or did, 
depending on
>   > how you look at it). And of course, many traditions agree with 
him.                        
> 
>   vashtirama at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>   I also notice many men are slightly less easy being checked in a 
private room by a lady
> 
>   Yes, well, given the graying of the movement I'm not surprised 
that most men find the 
>   experience somewhat less than pleasurable.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   To subscribe, send a message to:
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>   Or go to: 
>   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
>   and click 'Join This Group!' 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
>   Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
>     a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
>     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
>       
>     b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       
>     c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms 
of Service.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to