--- In [email protected], Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 4/29/05 1:36 PM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> >  
> > On Apr 29, 2005, at 2:27 PM, lupidus108 wrote:
> > 
> >> What is the source of this claim, a rumour ?
> >  
> > I thought I had heard at least one Shankaracharya state this, and 
this was
> > easily found on the web:
> > 
> > He is not without critics amongst his peer group, there are 
others,
> > coincidentally also from the Jabalpur area of India, who have 
openly
> > disparaged him. According to Osho World Online Magazine- June 
2004, Osho
> > (formerly Bhagavan Rajneesh) had this to say:-
> > 
> Anything Rajneesh says is an egregious case of the pot calling the 
kettle
> black.
> > 
> >  More serious are the allegations said to have been made by a 
fellow-disciple
> > of Guru Dev and now himself a Shankaracharya in his own right, 
Shankaracharya
> > of Dwarka, Swami Swaroopanand Saraswati in an interview with a 
former TM
> > teacher:- 
> > 
> >  Shankaracharya: This is true. In reality, preaching, initiating, 
guiding
> > people engaged in spiritual pursuits, is the duty of those who 
are born in a
> > Brahmin family. 
> > 
> So then Amma and Christ shouldn�t be teaching either. They both had 
humble
> beginnings.
> > 
> > If he is a follower of Sanatan Dharma (the Hindu religion), he 
should not do
> > what he is doing. This is against the orders of his Guru. 
Moreover, making
> > others write puujya (revered), calling himself Maharishi (a great 
seer) is
> > totally inappropriate. No assembly of saints has either conferred 
upon him a
> > title of Maharishi nor has announced him puujya. In the ashram he 
was doing
> > the work of typing and writing and translation. Then he became a 
sadhu.
> > However, he has never practiced yoga. (...)
> > 
> IMO Maharishi is most certainly a yogi by most anyone�s definition. 
People
> may be surprised to hear me defending MMY because I often come 
across as a
> critic. I have trouble with the sex and money business, but I have 
no doubts
> that Maharishi is one powerful dude. His darshan, as you know if 
you have
> ever been anywhere near him, is off the charts. His intellect, 
while nutty
> in recent years, has been extraordinarily brilliant at times. Who 
among us
> would have been capable of doing what he did? Proximity and service 
to Guru
> Dev were his spiritual practice, and a legitimate one if I 
understand
> scriptures correctly.

Rajneesh, who called himself God - Bhagvan, and Swaroopanand as 
lighthouses for a tradition from which to judge others ? Vaj must be 
pretty desperate in his attempts to discredit Maharishi.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to