Apparently they needed someone from the Shankaracharya tradition to testify at the Kropinski trial. They wanted to refute the idea (often stated in the TMO) that "TM" was unique or somehow "new".
On May 11, 2005, at 10:51 AM, Rick Archer wrote: > Hey Vaj, this was evidently written with reference to the TM movement, > but > why was it written? It seems there was some sort of law suit or court > case > underway. What was that all about? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
